By
TheoremΒ 1.37, the system
\(A\vec x = \vec b\) if and only if
\(\vec b\) is a linear combination of the columns of
\(A\text{.}\) Therefore, we have that
\begin{equation*}
\vec b \in \operatorname{Span}\left\{\begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 2 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} 3 \\ 8 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} 4 \\ 4 \\ -2 \end{bmatrix}\right\}
\end{equation*}
Unfortunately, this description of \(\vec b\) is not too informative as we do not know exactly how "big" that span is. (We will understand more about how "big" a span is when we learn about dimension in Chapter 2.)
Letβs augment
\(A\) with
\(\vec b\) and row reduce to determine if we encounter any problems. Note the following:
\(\begin{eqnarray*} \begin{bmatrix} 1 \amp 3 \amp 4 \amp \rvert \amp b_1 \\ 2 \amp 8 \amp 4 \amp \rvert \amp b_2 \\ 0 \amp 1 \amp -2 \amp \rvert \amp b_3 \end{bmatrix} \amp \sim \amp \begin{bmatrix} 1 \amp 3 \amp 4 \amp \rvert \amp b_1 \\ 0 \amp 2 \amp -4 \amp \rvert \amp b_2 - 2b_1 \\ 0 \amp 1 \amp -2 \amp \rvert \amp b_3 \end{bmatrix} \\
\amp \sim \amp \begin{bmatrix} 1 \amp 3 \amp 4 \amp \rvert \amp b_1 \\ 0 \amp 1 \amp -2 \amp \rvert \amp b_3 \\ 0 \amp 2 \amp -4 \amp \rvert \amp b_2 - 2b_1 \end{bmatrix} \\
\amp \sim \amp \begin{bmatrix} 1 \amp 3 \amp 4 \amp \rvert \amp b_1 \\ 0 \amp 1 \amp -2 \amp \rvert \amp b_3 \\ 0 \amp 0 \amp 0 \amp \rvert \amp b_2 - 2b_1 - 2b_3 \end{bmatrix}\end{eqnarray*}\)
By
TheoremΒ 1.20, the system is consistent if and only if
\(b_2 - 2b_1 - 2b_3 = 0\text{.}\) This is the defining characteristic for which
\(\vec b\) lead to
\(A\vec x = \vec b\) having a solution.
We could stop now, as we have answered the question, but notice we can work with the equation
\(b_2 - 2b_1 - 2b_3 = 0\) to get a more explicit description for
\(\vec b\text{.}\) Solving for
\(b_1\text{,}\) we see that
\(b_1 = \frac{1}{2}b_2 - b_3\text{.}\) We can think of this single equation in three variables as a system of linear equations. With this view, we see that variable
\(b_1\) is a pivot variable (which is why we solved for it), and variables
\(b_2\) and
\(b_3\) are free variables. By free variables, we literally mean that
\(b_2\) and
\(b_3\) can take on any values in
\(\mathbb{R}\text{.}\) To emphasize this, I usually set my free variables equal to other variables, typically
\(t, r, p, q, \dots\text{.}\) So, we have
\(b_2 = r \in \mathbb{R}\) and
\(b_3 = t \in \mathbb{R}\text{.}\) (Again, the renaming of the free variables is not necessary, but I like to do it. You are free to keep the free variables named
\(b_2\) and
\(b_3\text{.}\))
Now, we can solve for our pivot variable in terms of the free variables. So we get \(b_1 = \frac{1}{2}r - 2t\text{.}\) Putting this all together, we see that the vectors \(\vec b \in \mathbb{R}^3\) which make the system \(A\vec x = \vec b\) consistent are precisely the following:
\begin{equation*}
\vec b = \begin{bmatrix} b_1 \\ b_2 \\ b_3 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} \frac{1}{2}r - t \\ r \\ t \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} \frac{1}{2}r \\ r \\ 0 \end{bmatrix} + \begin{bmatrix} -t \\ 0 \\ t \end{bmatrix} = r\begin{bmatrix} \frac{1}{2} \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix} + t\begin{bmatrix} -1 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}
\end{equation*}
This form of our answer is called the parametric vector form which will be covered in the next section.
Note that at the beginning, we saw that \(\vec b\) had to live in the span of the columns of \(A\text{.}\) Now, we have learned a more descriptive way of describing \(\vec b\) in terms of span; that is, we have that
\begin{equation*}
\vec b \in \operatorname{Span}\left\{\begin{bmatrix} \frac{1}{2} \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} -1 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}\right\}
\end{equation*}
In fact, we have that
\begin{equation*}
\operatorname{Span}\left\{\begin{bmatrix} \frac{1}{2} \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} -1 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}\right\} = \operatorname{Span}\left\{\begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 2 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} 3 \\ 8 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} 4 \\ 4 \\ -2 \end{bmatrix}\right\}
\end{equation*}
This means that the original span was actually only 2-dimensional and not 3-dimensional as it at first appeared.